Mechanism for enhanced energy extraction and cooling pressurized gas

ABSTRACT

Systems, methods, and devices relating to a mechanism which can be used in gas cooling devices, pneumatic motors, turbines and other pressurized gas devices. A rotatable rotor is provided along with a number of hollow conduits that radially radiate from an exit port at the center of the rotor. The pressurized gas is injected into the mechanism at the inlet port(s). The gas enters the conduits and travels from the inlet port(s) to the exit port(s). In doing so, the gas causes the rotor to rotate about its central axis while the gas cools. This results in a colder gas at the exit port(s) than at the inlet port(s).

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention relates to methods and devices relating to thevortex tube effect and its application in a mechanism that can be usedin various practical applications.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Various physical phenomena have been analyzed and their practicalapplications have been found over the years. This document revisits theconcept of angular momentum conservation and the correspondingpropulsion imparted to a reference frame by an ejected fluid. The focusis on constrained flows within moving frames, where flow confinementresults in a well-defined physical problem. The thermophysics of thephenomena are examined with a particular goal in mind—namely, to predictthe fluid temperature as observed in different frames of reference, topredict the angular propulsion imparted to the rotating reference frame,as well as describe the underlying physics leading to such observations.Attention is devoted to the applicability of the presented physicalmodel to rotational flows, which exhibit radial temperature separation.A most relevant example is the vortex tube effect, discovered in 1933 bythe French physicist Georges J. Ranque. The effect has now been studiedfor nearly 80 years, yet while a number of models have been proposed,they remain a subject of debate. The fundamental reason for this is thecomplexity of vortex tube flow obscuring the underlying physics, whichin its turn obfuscates any concise understanding of the effect.Notwithstanding, interest in the vortex tube phenomena remains high, asdemonstrated by a present day literature search in the Google Scholardatabase resulting in 4240 references to published documents discussingthe topic of vortex tube airflow.

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

The present invention provides systems, methods, and devices relating toa mechanism which can be used in gas cooling devices, pneumatic motors,turbines and other pressurized gas devices. A rotatable rotor isprovided along with a number of hollow conduits that radially radiatefrom an exit port at or near the center of the rotor. The pressurizedgas is provided to the mechanism at the inlet(s) of the rotor. The gasthen enters the conduits and travels from the inlet(s) of the rotor tothe exit port. In doing so, the gas causes the rotor to rotate about itscentral axis while the gas cools. This results in a colder gas at theexit port than at the outer perimeter of the rotor.

In one aspect, the present invention provides a mechanism comprising:

-   -   a rotatable rotor having an axis of rotation;    -   an exit port;    -   an inlet port, said inlet port being at a periphery of said        rotor, said inlet port being for receiving pressurized gas from        said periphery of said rotor;    -   a hollow conduit, said hollow conduit directly connecting said        inlet port to said exit port;        wherein    -   a radial distance between said axis of rotation and said exit        port is less than a radial distance between said axis of        rotation and said inlet port;    -   pressurized gas received at said inlet port passes from a        periphery of said rotor to said exit port through said conduit        to thereby cause said rotor to rotate about said axis of        rotation;    -   after passing through said conduit, said pressurized gas at said        exit port is colder than said pressurized gas at said periphery        of said rotor.

In another aspect, the present invention provides a method for cooling agas, the method comprising:

-   -   a) pressurizing said gas to produce a pressurized gas;    -   b) providing a mechanism comprising:        -   a rotatable rotor having an axis of rotation;        -   an inlet port at a periphery of said rotor;        -   an exit port, a radial distance between said exit port and            said axis of rotation being less than a radial distance            between said inlet port and said axis of rotation;        -   a hollow conduit directly connecting said inlet port to said            exit port;    -   c) providing said pressurized gas at a periphery of said        rotatable rotor to allow said pressurized gas to enter said        inlet port;

wherein

-   -   pressurized gas provided at said inlet port passes from the        periphery of said rotor to said exit port through said conduit        to thereby cause said rotor to rotate about said axis of        rotation.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The embodiments of the present invention will now be described byreference to the following figures, in which identical referencenumerals in different figures indicate identical elements and in which:

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram used to explain the principles of theinvention;

FIG. 2 is a partially transparent isometric view of a mechanismaccording to one aspect of the invention;

FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of the mechanism of FIG. 2; and

FIG. 4 is an exploded view of the mechanism illustrated in FIG. 2.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The uniform rotation of a straight adiabatic duct about the verticalsymmetry axis of its outlet produces cooling of air at the rotationcenter of the device. Air is supplied to the duct inlet by a pressurizedgas tank at room temperature. In this simple illustration (FIG. 1), thetank is mounted to the duct inlet and rotates with the duct. As airmoves radially inward, it imparts its kinetic and internal energy aspropulsion to the rotating system. This produces a twofold benefit:elimination of the requirement for power to sustain rotation; andcooling of air at the exit of device. Based on these findings it isconcluded that the rotation of this simple device and the accompanyingrefrigeration of air can be utilized in providing instantaneous,on-demand refrigeration of air, and shaft work due to angular propulsionof the rotating system.

Thus in one aspect the present invention provides a rotational device,comprising:

-   -   a) a conduit D with length R and drive means connected to the        conduit D to impart rotational velocity to said conduit D;    -   b) an air tank, which provides compressed air to the inlet of        duct D    -   c) a cold exit vent positioned at a device centre, wherein        pre-rotated air, supplied at device periphery is run through the        device and undergoes a sharp temperature decrease, as this        spiral motion of air leads to the exhaust of cold air via said        central exit vent.

Generally speaking, the systems described herein are directed to methodand device that reproduces and controls the vortex tube effect. Asrequired, embodiments of the present invention are disclosed herein.However, the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary, and it shouldbe understood that the invention may be embodied in many various andalternative forms. The Figures are not to scale and some features may beexaggerated or minimized to show details of particular elements whilerelated elements may have been eliminated to prevent obscuring novelaspects. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosedherein are not to be interpreted as limiting but merely as a basis forthe claims and as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in theart to variously employ the present invention.

For purposes of teaching and not limitation, the illustrated embodimentsare directed to the method and device that that reproduces and controlsthe vortex tube effect.

It should be noted that the analysis of the vortex phenomenon assumes apriori that a rotating flow can be discretized. Also examined is thebehavior of the phenomenon's discrete element—a paradigm through whichthe long-standing physical phenomenon of temperature separation unravelsand becomes accessible to analysis. The main reasoning in this workfollows along the lines of establishing relative contexts of astationary and moving observer, positioned in their correspondingreference frames, followed by an examination of relative flow motion andthe relevant conservation laws.

In the physics of fluids, the thermodynamic (or static) temperatureT_(S) is that which corresponds to thermal equilibrium and is the samein all frames of reference. The total, or stagnation, temperature is aneffective temperature that originates from the total (or stagnation)enthalpy

h=h·v ²/2

via division by the isobaric heat capacity c_(p), and takes the form

$\begin{matrix}{{T \equiv {T_{s} + \frac{v^{2}}{2\; c_{p}}}},} & (1)\end{matrix}$

where v is the fluid velocity. Because the total temperature contains v,it is, consequently, frame-dependent. In a moving frame F′, thistemperature becomes

$\begin{matrix}{{T_{rel} \equiv {T_{s} + \frac{v^{\prime \; 2}}{2\; c_{p}}}},} & (2)\end{matrix}$

where v′ is the flow velocity relative to the frame. In adiabatic ductflow, the conservation of energy demands that the total enthalpy isconserved. Thus, utilizing the connection between total enthalpy andtotal temperature, energy conservation can also be expressed as

T=const  (3)

under adiabatic flow conditions.

Consider the reference frame F′, rotating about the z-axis with constantangular velocity ω=const. Energy conservation in rotating fluid flowshas the form

$\begin{matrix}{{T_{s} + \frac{v^{\prime \; 2} - ( {\omega \times r} )^{2}}{2\; c_{p}}} = {const}} & (4)\end{matrix}$

under adiabatic conditions. Let the rotating frame F′ be attached to afluid flow system, comprising a tank of compressible fluid under highpressure and room temperature T∞, connected to the inlet of an adiabaticduct, as shown in FIG. 1. The compressed fluid is allowed to flowthrough the duct where it gradually expands, accelerates and exits atthe center of the frame. The velocity addition formula for the system is

v=v′|ω×r  (5)

Expressing v′ and substituting it into the energy conservation condition(4) yields

$\begin{matrix}{{T_{s} + \frac{v^{2} - {2\; {v \cdot ( {\omega \times r} )}} + ( {\omega \times r} )^{2} - ( {\omega \times r} )^{2}}{2\; c_{p}}} = {{const}.}} & (6)\end{matrix}$

Reworking this expression to include the total fluid temperature T seenin the stationary frame yields

$\begin{matrix}{{T_{s} + \frac{v \cdot ( {\omega \times r} )}{2\; c_{p}}} = {{const}.}} & (7)\end{matrix}$

Therefore, the observer in the stationary frame F will report atemperature difference

$\begin{matrix}{{\Delta \; T} = {{{T({inlet})} - {T({outlet})}} = {\frac{v_{inlet} \cdot ( {\omega \times r_{inlet}} )}{c_{p}} - \frac{v_{outlet} \cdot ( {\omega \times r_{outlet}} )}{c_{p}}}}} & (8)\end{matrix}$

between the high-energy peripheral flow and the low-energy flow at therotation center. Since in this particular fluid flow system the duct isstraight,

v′|ω×r

everywhere, and because the flow exits at the rotation center,r_(outlet)=0. If we denote the peripheral tip speed of the duct

ω×r _(outlet)

as c, then (8) reduces to

$\begin{matrix}{{\Delta \; T} = {{{T({inlet})} - {T({outlet})}} = {\frac{c^{2}}{c_{p}}.}}} & (9)\end{matrix}$

Thermodynamics of the flow is interpreted in F and F′ as follows:

According to an observer in the moving frame F′:

1. Both static and relative total temperatures in the fluid tank areequal to T_(∞);2. The tank fluid expands through the duct and does work to overcome thecentrifugal gravitational potential −(ω×r)²/2; the exiting fluid haslost internal energy and gained gravitational potential energy;3. The fluid accelerates through the duct, due to expansion, andexperiences the deflecting action of the Coriolis force;4. At the outlet, the exiting fluid has a higher velocity than at theduct inlet due to expansion, but has lost internal energy and isc²/2c_(p) cooler than T_(∞).

According to an observer in the stationary frame F:

1. The total temperature in the pressurized fluid tank isT=T_(∞)+c²/2c_(p) due to the motion of F′;2. The fluid speed at the duct inlet is equal to c and the temperatureis equal to the temperature in the fluid tank T(inlet)=T_(∞)+c²/2c_(p);3. High-energy fluid decelerates as it approaches the outlet; that is,while the radial velocity increases, the tangential velocity goes tozero, resulting in a substantial net deceleration;4. At the outlet, the exiting fluid has low velocity and has also lostinternal energy. This conclusion contradicts the intuition of thestationary observer, since a high-energy volume of compressible fluid isexpected to exhibit a static temperature rise when brought to restadiabatically.

It is seen that the energy conservation condition (7) imposes radialdependence in the total temperature known as temperature separation. Itis a physical phenomenon, in which rotating fluid flow appears heated atthe periphery and cooled at the center of rotation. Therefore, in thecase of rotation, cooling of the ejected fluid is due to conservation ofangular momentum and the corresponding angular propulsion imparted tothe rotating frame. It is this critical element that leads to a clearunderstanding of the temperature separation effect in fluids. Since theenergy conservation requirement (4) applies under adiabatic conditions,it prohibits heat exchange through the duct walls in the system inFIG. 1. Therefore the cooling of the fluid (9) is a result of adiabaticexpansion, during which the fluid does work on its surroundings bypropelling the moving reference frame.

Let us now begin to examine the rotating duct system with the goal ofdetermining the propulsion energy that goes into the rotation as aresult of an ejection of the gas coming from the tank. For this purpose,consider that the rotating tank and duct assembly is a system withvariable mass. This is the main physical context within which thefollowing study will be made.

Let M be the constant composite mass of this system, moving with angularvelocity ω=c/r in a circle with radius r. For generality, consider theposition vector R and velocity vector v in the stationary frame ofreference F (which reduce to r and c in the system shown in FIG. 1).Consider an external torque (e.g. resistance of the medium) τ_(ext) beacting on M at time t. At some later moment t+Δt, the composite systemejects mass ΔM, which moves radially inwards on a radial constraint andthus the angular momenta L are

L(t)=R×Mv

L(t+Δt)=R×(M−ΔM)(v+Δv).

The rotational equivalent to the second law of Newton

R×M{dot over (v)}=τ _(ext) −R×{dot over (M)}v,

for this constant mass system in F is τ_(ext)=ΔL/Δt, which leads to theequation of rotational motion as Δt_(→)0 where the mass flux dM/dt isnegative, since the mass of the body is decreasing in time. A tacitassumption is that mass dM, even though moving initially with velocity vas part of the composite mass M, reaches zero velocity at the rotationcenter within a time interval dt.

For rotating systems with finite size, this is still a reasonableassumption, since masses dM, each moving with their own speed within thesystem, form a continuous radial flow of ejected mass dM/dt.

The expression

R×{dot over (M)}v

represents rotational thrust, which is maximum in the stationary frameF, since the velocity of the expelled mass is zero. This expression hasdimension of torque; it is to be attributed to the third law of Newton,according to which the rotating system experiences the reaction torqueof the radially ejected mass flow dM/dt.

The rotational motion produced always corresponds to maximum thrust whenmass is ejected at the center of rotation where its velocity is zero.Let us consider the case v=const, where the external resistance of theenvironment is precisely counterbalanced by the rotational thrust. Inthis case, the power delivered to the rotational system by the thrusttorque is since

τ_(ext) ·ω={dot over (M)}v ²

since

τ_(ext) =R×Mv and R⊥v

which leads to

τ_(ext)·ω¹²=τ_(ext)ω.

Then, the thrust energy delivered to the system per expelled mass M is

E _(t) =Mv ².

The equations of mechanics are sufficient to describe the concept of thepropelled rotational motion. However, one is led to conclude that themost practically important variable mass systems will rely on theproperties of gas: gases can form continuous flow and thus produceconstant thrust; also, gases are capable of storing energy, which isreflected by their temperature. For these reasons, the thermodynamics ofrotating variable mass systems is important, and will be included inthis study.

As it was shown in (9) above, the exiting gas experiences a drop intotal temperature ΔT=c²/c_(p). It was shown, that according to anobserver in F, there is a radial gradient of the total temperature overthe entire radial extent of the system. The tank at the peripheryappears heated (entirely kinetic, not thermodynamic heating), while theexhaust gas at the center is cold. Since the total temperature T isdefined through the total (stagnation) enthalpy of the gas, the energytransferred as propulsion to the rotating system is

E _(t) =c _(p) MΔT=Δv ²,

the same expression as the one for thrust energy delivery (with v=c atthe duct inlet), calculated above entirely with the equations ofmechanics. Thus, energy was invested into the gas in a twofold process:(i) energy Mv²/2 was invested as internal energy and (ii) kinetic energyMv²/2 was invested by setting the system in rotational motion withangular velocity co. By ejecting itself from the center of mass of therotating system, gas with mass M spends internal energy Mv²/2 in orderto decrease its kinetic energy by Mv²/2, thus imparting rotationalthrust energy Mv² to the system.

Thus, rotary propulsion motion producing maximum thrust is therotational motion of a system with variable mass, exhausting at itscenter. The rotational system can also be characterized as an angularpropulsion engine (APE) that derives thrust torque due to conservationof angular momentum, i.e. τ_(ext)=ΔL/Δt. The maximum propulsion energyattributed to an APE having peripheral speed v by the ejection of gas atits center is Mv²—a sum of two equal energy portions, one of which isdue to the deceleration of the expelled gas and the other to itscooling. The basic rotational system we studied exhibits a gradient ofthe total temperature over the entire radial extent of the system, aswitnessed in the stationary reference frame F. The mechanics of therotating system has a direct and precise connection to the cooling ofgas explained in the thermodynamics argument above, and thus furtherelucidates the concept of angular propulsion. In addition, the treatmentpresented herein shows that the thermophysics of the rotating system isderived based on existing laws; no special treatment to the mass,Navier-Stokes or energy transport equations for compressible, rotatingflows is implied. On this basis, it is not surprising that commerciallyavailable computational fluid dynamics solvers are already capable ofpredicting the observed cooling effect.

What are the conditions under which no cooling is observed? If thereference frame containing the flow is not moving, no cooling will beobserved since the frame is unable to absorb the flow energy. For a ductat rest, where the exiting flow velocity has been chosen to be equal toc, no temperature decrease is observed. Cooling in the stationary frameis produced only when the duct system is moving and able to absorb theenergy of the flow as thrust or propulsion. The produced temperatureseparation ΔT grows with the magnitude of the frame velocity c and islimited by the speed of sound in the surrounding fluid for practicalreasons. ΔT is always symmetric with respect to the ambient temperatureT_(∞) and equal to c²/c_(p). When c is nearly equal to the speed ofsound at sea level (340 m/s), ΔT=115.2 K. The heating of c²/2c_(p)=57.6K is entirely dynamic and due to the motion of the duct periphery withvelocity c; the cooling is due to an adiabatic expansion needed toovercome the centrifugal potential barrier and has magnitude ofc²/2c_(p)=57.6 K.

It is also important to note that compressibility of the fluid is vitalfor storing internal energy, which would later be imparted to the frameupon decompression as well as result in a reduction of statictemperature. In the case of incompressible fluids, energy is stilltransferred to the frame due to angular momentum conservation, howeverthis cannot produce cooling as the fluid is unable to give up internalenergy. The same conclusion is found in the work of R. Balmer, wherewater was used as the working fluid in a vortex tube. Cooling was notachieved in any of the conducted experiments by Balmer and fluid at theperiphery was reported to have an elevated temperature. This result isconsistent with angular propulsion imparted on the rotating fluid,resulting in high kinetic energies at the periphery consequently leadingto heating through friction.

It is also worth noting that the magnitude of AT does not depend on theradial size of the rotating system, as long as its peripheral velocityis equal to c in the stationary frame. In addition, centrifugal andCoriolis forces alone cannot alter the total temperature of the flow,since no work is subtracted from the fluid under gravity.

Flow through the rotating duct shown in FIG. 1 was also computed usingthe commercial computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solver FLUENT todemonstrate that the results of the presented theoretical model are alsoobtained by discretely solving the differential transport equations formass, momentum and energy. Simulations were performed with air as anideal gas using the 3-dimensional, double precision discretization modelfor compressible flow. The standard version of the k-ε model withwall-functions was used to characterize turbulence effects, and thesecond-order upwind discretization scheme was used to model advection inthe transport equations. Since physical scale is not a factor in thecurrent treatment, the duct was given a length of 15 m and rectangularcross-sectional dimensions 0.3 m×0.4 m with no-slip, adiabatic walls.Smaller or larger ducts will produce the same effect provided therotational speed is adjusted to develop the same pressure gradientacross the duct. In all calculations, the mass flow rate of the air wasfixed at 3 kg/s; the highest rotational speed was selected such that theperipheral velocity of the duct c remained subsonic. Energy, momentumand mass conservation were reached in all simulations, with residualsdecreasing smoothly to below 10⁻¹³. Table 1 compares the theoreticalΔT=ω²r²/c_(p) (r=15 m) with its corresponding total temperaturedifference predicted by FLUENT for different rotational speeds

TABLE 1 ΔT for different rotation rates (1), rod/s 0 2 5 10 15 20 ΔT,CFD [K] 0 0.89 5.53 22.08 49.68 88.3 ΔT, Eq. (9). [K] 0 0.9 5.61 22.4250.45 89.69

The CFD predictions approximate the theoretical result to within 1.5% inall cases. This comparison shows that the numerical values for AT givenby Equation (9) are also obtained using another well-established method;it should be borne in mind that CFD utilizes discretization andturbulence modeling and as such represents an approximation to thephysical phenomena described above.

While the setup in FIG. 1 is not identical to a vortex tube, itdemonstrates the essential physical characteristics of the vortex tubeflow, namely spiral flow geometry accompanied by radial pressure andtemperature behavior. Therefore, a rotating duct or conduit can beconsidered a discrete element of the vortex tube flow field. It presentsa simplification in the description of vortex tube flow, which allowsfor a succinct explanation of the vortex tube phenomenon. For therotating duct, flow is driven from the periphery to the center by apressure gradient that opposes the centrifugal gravitational fieldinduced by rotation. Energy is imparted by the expanding fluid to propelthe rotating frame via the interface between the fluid and the solid(i.e. the duct or conduit wall). In this manner, maximum energy exchangeoccurs and the maximum possible temperature separation is observed. Inthe case of a vortex tube, flow is driven from the periphery of the tubeto the center by a pressure gradient that opposes the inducedgravitational field, but the expanding fluid can only transfer energy tothe rotating frame (the fluid itself) via fluid friction, leading toless efficient cooling than that for the confined flow.

A key difference between the rotating duct and the vortex tube is thenecessity of a hot fluid outlet in the latter. The hot outlet is notrequired in the rotating duct because the compressed fluid source isrotating with the duct; the only heating that occurs is due to fluidfriction opposing the flow towards the duct outlet. In a vortex tube,the fluid enters the tube at the periphery to generate the swirlingflow, and to set up the (centrifugal) gravitational field and thepressure gradient. Because of the high flow speeds required to set upthe required gravitational field, fluid friction results in significantviscous dissipation at the periphery, which must be removed to achieveany cooling effect at the cold outlet (relative to the inlet). If thehot outlet were closed, the fluid leaving the system would simply absorball of the viscous heat and leave the system warmer than it entered.

In terms of the magnitude of temperature separation, the controlparameters in either case are the rotational speed of the fluid and theradius from the center to the periphery, since this sets up the strengthof the centrifugal gravitational field, which dictates the pressuregradient from the periphery to the center. This pressure gradientdictates the maximum temperature drop that can be achieved by expansionof the fluid as it flows towards the cold outlet.

When radial flow of a compressible fluid takes place in a uniformlyrotating adiabatic duct, the resulting cooling that is observed at thecentre of rotation is due to adiabatic expansion of the fluid as well asconservation of angular momentum, which demands transfer of internal androtational energy of the moving mass to the rotational energy of thesystem. Cooling cannot be produced in a stationary duct by gravity, asframe motion is required for an energy transfer to occur.Compressibility is another required factor for cooling since it reflectsthe ability of the fluid to give away internal energy. Of keyimportance, is that the confined rotating fluid flow system presented inthis work exhibits the essential physics of the vortex tube flow, namelyradial temperature and pressure gradients as well as velocity fields andflow geometry. It is therefore plausible to consider this simplifiedflow system as a discrete element of vortex tube flow, which provides aconcise understanding of the observed temperature separation phenomenon.

The above can be seen as the theoretical basis for one aspect of theinvention. In one implementation, the present invention provides amechanism which may be used for rotary motors, the cooling of gases, andthe efficient conversion of gas pressure into mechanical work.

Referring to FIG. 2, a partially transparent isometric view of themechanism is provided. As can be seen, the partially transparent view inFIG. 2 is provided to present the internal workings and components ofthe mechanism.

The mechanism 10 in FIG. 2 has four inlet ports 20 through which apressurized gas can be provided to the mechanism. A rotatable rotor 30is inside the mechanism. The rotor 30 has an exit port 40 located at itscenter and four conduits 50 extend radially from the exit port 40 to theouter perimeter of the rotor. The conduits 50 are hollow and provide apassageway for pressurized gas to travel from the outer perimeter of therotor to the exit port. In this embodiment of the invention, theconduits are all straight and do not deviate from the exit port to theouter perimeter of the rotor.

Referring to FIG. 3, a side cut-away view of the mechanism in FIG. 2 isprovided. The exit port 40 at the center of the rotor 30 leads to a gasexit shaft 60 through which the pressurized gas exits the mechanism. Tofacilitate the rotation of the rotor 30, the rotor 30 is sandwichedbetween bearings 70 which allow the rotor 30 to freely rotate. Adriveshaft 80 is coupled to the rotor 30 such that rotation of the rotor30 similarly rotates the driveshaft 80. As can be seen, the gas exitshaft 60 is inside the hollow driveshaft 80. Seals 90 adjacent thebearings 70 and the driveshaft 80 ensure that an airtight seal ismaintained for the mechanism. Similarly, an enclosure 100 provides anairtight environment for the mechanism. In this configuration, thedriveshaft 80 is collinear with the rotor's axis of rotation.

It should be noted that, preferably, there should be minimal spacebetween the rotor and the upper and lower portions of the enclosure.However, there should a gap 110 between the outer perimeter or periphery120 of the rotor 30 and the inside wall 130 of the enclosure 100. Thegap 110 is there to allow the pressurized gas to travel from the inletports to the various conduits.

In operation, a pressurized gas is provided to the mechanism by way ofthe inlet ports. In FIGS. 2-4, the said ports are oriented such that gasis injected in a direction tangential to the rotor periphery and in thedirection of rotor rotation. This configuration is preferable as itprovides optimal results. The pressurized gas enters the conduits andtravels from the outer perimeter of the rotor to the exit port at thecenter of the rotor. In doing so, the pressurized gas causes the rotorto rotate about its center and thereby also causes the driveshaft torotate. While travelling from the outer perimeter or periphery of therotor to the exit port, the temperature of the pressurized gas drops,thereby providing a cooler gas at the exit port than at the outerperimeter of the rotor.

An exploded view of the mechanism in FIGS. 2-3 is illustrated in FIG. 4to provide the reader with a more detailed view of the various parts ofthe mechanism.

Regarding the implementation of the mechanism illustrated in FIGS. 2-4,the four conduits illustrated divide the rotor into four quadrants.Preferably, these quadrants are of equal size with each conduit being at90 degrees from adjacent conduits for the purpose of mechanicalbalancing of the rotor.

It should be noted that while four straight conduits are shown in thedrawings, other configurations are possible. As an example, a threeconduit configuration is possible, with each conduit being at 120degrees to its adjacent conduits. Similarly, more than four conduits maybe used.

Again regarding the spacing of the conduits on the rotor, it should benoted that while a regular spacing between conduits is preferable, anuneven spacing between the conduits may also be used.

It should be noted that the rotor can be extended axially to providespace such that radial conduits can be provided in layers, therebyallowing for any number and configuration of conduits. Differentconfigurations of such an arrangement is possible. As an example,differing layers of conduits and rotors may be stacked above one anotherwith a common exit port at the center of the driveshaft for the varyingrotors.

The conduits may be formed as a tunnel in the material of a solid rotoror the conduits may be a hollow tube embedded in the structure of therotor. Similarly, the conduits need not be located within therotor—placement of the rotor may be above, under, or inside the rotor aslong as the rotor is coupled to the rotor such that pressurized gastravelling through the conduits will cause the rotor to rotate. Theconduits may have any suitable shape but it has been found that straightconduits that directly radiate from the center of the rotor to therotor's periphery provided the best results.

As well, while the figures illustrate straight conduits which radiallyradiate from the center of the rotor, straight conduits which aretangential to the central exit port are also possible. Such aconfiguration would still have each conduit providing a direct passagefrom the outer perimeter of the rotor to the exit port. However, forthis configuration, the conduits would be directing the pressurized gasin a direction tangential to the exit port instead of in a directionthat is radial to the exit port.

The pressurized gas may be provided to the periphery of the rotor in anysuitable manner. Preferably, if the pressurized gas is to be injectedinto the mechanism, the gas is to be injected in a direction that istangential to the rotor and at right angles to the rotor's axis ofrotation. Differing angles at which the pressurized gas may be providedto the mechanism may be used as long as the gas is not injected in adirection with components that are opposite to the direction of rotationof the rotor. As well, it is preferred that the direction of thepressurized gas is not parallel to the axis of rotation of the rotor.

It should be noted that the radial distance between the rotor's axis ofrotation and the exit port should be less than the radial distancebetween the rotor's axis of rotation and the inlet port. In theconfiguration illustrated in FIGS. 2-4, the rotor's axis of rotation isat the center of the rotor such that the distance between the rotor'saxis of rotation and the exit port is at a minimum. However, otherconfigurations where the exit port is not at the center of the rotor arepossible. It should further be noted that, while multiple exit ports arealso possible, a single exit port at the center of the rotor ispreferable as this has been shown to provide the best results.

For configurations that have multiple exit ports, each of the variousconduits connects one or more of the inlet ports to an exit port. Itshould be clear that the various inlet ports and their associated exitports need not be on the same plane. It should also be clear that eachinlet port is associated with an exit port with a conduit directlyconnecting an inlet port (or multiple inlet ports) with an exit port.

It should be noted that in the configuration illustrated in FIGS. 2-4,the inlet port is located at the periphery of the rotor. However, otherconfigurations where the inlet port is not at the periphery of the rotorare possible, as long as the radial distance from the center of rotationto the inlet port is larger than the radial distance from the center ofrotation to the associated exit port.

It should also noted that not all inlet ports need be at the same radiallocation. Any configuration is possible provided that the radialdistance from the center of rotation to the inlet port is larger thanthe radial distance from the center of rotation to the associated exitport.

While FIGS. 2-4 and the discussion above describes multiple conduits, aconfiguration using a single inlet port and a single conduit connectingthe inlet port to a single exit port is also possible.

Regarding the pressurized gas, this may be any suitable gas such ascompressed air.

Regarding the use of the mechanism, the mechanism may be used in anydevice, motor, engine, or system that involves a rotating rotor or thecooling of a pressurized gas. As noted above, the temperature of thepressurized gas at the periphery of the rotor is higher than the gasexiting at the exit port. Accordingly, the mechanism may be used inapplications that require the cooling or the lowering of the temperatureof a pressurized gas. Similarly, the rotation of the rotor may be usedto turn a shaft that can be used to do work. The mechanism may thereforebe used as part of a pneumatic engine, turbine or motor.

In one configuration, the rotation of the rotor may be used topressurize gas to be used in the mechanism. As an example, gas exitingthrough an exit port may be recycled by being pressurized using therotation of the rotor. Once pressurized, the pressurized gas may then bereintroduced into the system.

Once the pressurized gas has been introduced into the system, apre-rotation may be needed to start the system. This may take the formof manually rotating the rotor. Once the rotor starts rotating, thepressurized gas in the system can continue the rotor's rotation.

To better understand the principles behind the invention, the followingreferences are provided. These references are hereby incorporated byreference.

-   G. J. Ranque, “Experiments on expansion in a vortex with    simultaneous exhaust of hot and cold air”, J. Phys. Radium, vol.    4, p. 112S, 1933.-   Y. Xue, M. Arjomandi and R. Kelso, “A critical review of temperature    separation in a vortex tube”, Exper. Therm. Fluid Sci., vol. 34, p.    1367, 2010.-   E. A. Baskharone, “Principles of Turbomachinery in air-breathing    engines”, Cambridge University Press, Jul. 31, 2006.-   M. G. Rose, “From Rothalpy to Losses”, Lecture Notes, Swiss Federal    Institute of Technology LSM Zurich 2002.-   R. Resnick and D. Halliday, “Physics I”, p. 307, Wiley, 1966.-   R. T. Balmer, “Pressure-driven Ranque-Hilsch Temperature Separation    in Liquids”, J. Fluid Engn., vol. 110, p. 161, 1988.

A person understanding this invention may now conceive of alternativestructures and embodiments or variations of the above all of which areintended to fall within the scope of the invention as defined in theclaims that follow.

We claim:
 1. A mechanism comprising: a rotatable rotor having an axis ofrotation; an exit port; an inlet port, said inlet port being forreceiving pressurized gas; a hollow conduit, said hollow conduitdirectly connecting said inlet port to said exit port; wherein a radialdistance between said axis of rotation and said exit port is less than aradial distance between said axis of rotation and said inlet port;pressurized gas received at said inlet port passes from said inlet portto said exit port through said conduit to thereby cause said rotor torotate about said axis of rotation; after passing through said conduit,said pressurized gas at said exit port is colder than said pressurizedgas at said inlet port.
 2. A mechanism according to claim 1 wherein saidconduit is part of said rotor.
 3. A mechanism according to claim 1wherein said conduit is mounted on said rotor.
 4. A mechanism accordingto claim 1 wherein said conduit radially extends from said exit port tosaid inlet port.
 5. A mechanism according to claim 1 wherein saidmechanism is sealed within an airtight enclosure.
 6. A mechanismaccording to claim 1 wherein said mechanism is used to decrease atemperature of said pressurized gas.
 7. A mechanism according to claim 1wherein said mechanism lowers a temperature of said pressurized gas andconverts energy extracted from said pressurized gas into rotationalwork.
 8. A mechanism according to claim 1 wherein a temperaturedifference between said pressurized gas at said inlet port and saidpressurized gas at said exit port is up toc ² /c _(p) where c is a tangential velocity at an inlet port with agreatest radial distance from said axis of rotation of said rotor andc_(p) is an isobaric heat capacity of said pressurized gas.
 9. Amechanism according to claim 1 wherein said pressurized gas is injectedat said inlet port, said pressurized gas being injected at a directiontangential to said rotor and at right angles to said axis of rotation.10. A mechanism according to claim 1 further comprising at least oneother exit port.
 11. A mechanism according to claim 10 furthercomprising at least one further inlet port and at least one furtherconduit, said at least one further conduit connecting said at least onefurther inlet port to either said at least one other exit port or saidexit port.
 12. A mechanism according to claim 10 further comprising atleast one further inlet port and at least one further conduit, said atleast one further conduit connecting said at least one further inletport to said exit port.
 13. A mechanism according to claim 1 wherein arotation of said rotor is used to pressurize a gas to result in saidpressurized gas.
 14. A mechanism according to claim 13 wherein said gasis derived from pressurized gas exiting through said exit port.
 15. Amechanism according to claim 1 wherein a distance between said axis ofrotation and said exit port is at a minimum.
 16. A mechanism accordingto claim 1 wherein an amount of energy transferred as propulsion to saidrotor is up toE _(t) =Mv ² where E_(t) is said amount of energy transferred; M is amass of pressurized gas exiting at said exit port; and v is a velocityof an inlet port with a greatest radial distance from said axis ofrotation of said rotor.
 17. A method for cooling a gas, the methodcomprising: a) providing a mechanism comprising: a rotatable rotorhaving an axis of rotation; an inlet port; an exit port, a radialdistance between said exit port and said axis of rotation being lessthan a radial distance between said inlet port and said axis ofrotation; a hollow conduit directly connecting said inlet port to saidexit port; b) providing said pressurized gas to allow said pressurizedgas to enter said inlet port; wherein pressurized gas provided at saidinlet port passes from said inlet port to said exit port through saidconduit to thereby cause said rotor to rotate about said axis ofrotation.
 18. A method according to claim 17 wherein a difference intemperature between said gas at said inlet port and said gas at saidexit port is up toc ² /c _(p) where c is a tangential velocity at an inlet port with agreatest radial distance from said axis of rotation of said rotor andc_(p) is an isobaric heat capacity of said pressurized gas.
 19. A methodaccording to claim 17 wherein an amount of energy transferred aspropulsion to said rotor is up toE _(t) =Mv ² where E_(t) is said amount of energy transferred; M is amass of pressurized gas exiting at said exit port; and v is a tangentialvelocity at an inlet port with a greatest radial distance from said axisof rotation of said rotor.